

You should contact their support, they’re responsive
You should contact their support, they’re responsive
They might publish components of it enough to verify that the processing code is not emitting any data but as others said - it could’ve been done locally on the phone
From what I gather the texts are encrypted and sent to their LLMs that process it with some mechanism to verify the code being run in the cloud to process the texts is one that the WhatsApp app agreed to.
But they could just as well start siphoning the data after changing that code. Everyone will be able to see the cloud code changed if/when tbat happens but I don’t think there’s a way to differentiate that from a regular update.
Don’t think theyve opensourced any of this
Are people downvoting because the reportrd change sucks or does the article itself suck?
“But why, everyone is on WhatsApp”, and also a lot of businesses. “Privacy? I’ve got nothing to hide, what are they gonna do eith my info?”
😏
Are you saying that for WhatsApp specifically or for online chat in general?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Ux8DFgMSM
Might give you some ideas on how to do that
Unfortunately “better” varies from person to person. Signal is behind on features, e.g. WhatsApp has integration for businesses (customer support).
I hope my monthly donation will help but we must realize for some some features are important, I guess that for most it’s how many ppl they know is there/unwilling to lead a migration
Say all the countries have privacy invasive rules. How can companies like Proton provide services? Build a server farm on the moon?
I remember the high seas servers once were hosted on balloons or boats at some point
That makes sense
End users: To access Gemini summary cards, users need to have smart features and personalization smart features in Gmail, Chat, and Meet and smart features in Google Workspace turned on. Visit the Help Center to learn more about collaborating with Gemini in Gmail.
Sounds like it’s an opt in, what am I missing
I can relate. They usually tend to go for basic features for max reach, but they’re just slow, maybe due to their size. At least everything is faiely stable compared to other services I’ve seen
You can request features here: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/
Time to go back to 1d printers then
It also somewhat instils distrust in science IMO, goes along the “eggs were bad for our health just 10y ago” type of argument
I’d recommend reading the article before trying to make a comparison.
When water condenses on surfaces, it usually requires either a drop in temperature or very high humidity levels. Conventional water harvesting methods rely on these principles, often requiring energy input to chill surfaces or a dense fog to form to collect water passively from humid environments. But Lee and Patel’s system works differently.
Do you have a resource handy for anti fingerprint measures?
True, but also want to emphasize that this has worldwide implications, the NIH is a major contributor to clinical research. Probably more harmful if it produces garbage data than less data
What software do you use to get that overlay on the top left?